banner

Go Back   In The Crease > ITC Operations > League Rules

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-30-2010, 11:08 AM
C.J's Avatar
C.J C.J is offline
New York Rangers
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 788
Send a message via MSN to C.J
Default Locked Teams, Free Keepers Rule Changes

Thinking about these issues this morning I asked myself "why do we even have free keepers"?

Free keepers essentially takes players away from the draft as each team probably has 2-3 free keepers on top of their 4 farm players.

So really most teams are protecting 15-16 players under the current system (+4 Farm). This makes no sense as 13 keepers is plenty....

Teams have also taken advantage of free keepers as their season ends by dropping players they will not keep and pick up a few free keepers.

I am thinking that the free keepers really just hurts the weaker teams to some degree as they are drafting from a weaker draft pool.

Why not kill 2 birds with one stone here......and we can do the following in both leagues:

- increase the farm to 5

- eliminate the free keepers

- keep all rosters open all year, including playoffs

I think this not only solves some of our current problems, but also puts more players back into the waiver draft for a better selection.

** this also solves the issue that Steve (MTL) brought up regarding players signed by NHL clubs (Mats Zuccarello Aasen) because now these players will be available to everyone.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-30-2010, 11:38 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
Boston Bruins
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 59
Default

why was there even free keepers to begin with? it never made sense...lol. 13 keepers should be 13 keepers period in my opinion so this is a great idea.

get er done!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-30-2010, 11:51 AM
Chris's Avatar
Chris Chris is offline
Ottawa Senators
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Halifax
Posts: 75
Send a message via Yahoo to Chris
Default

I'm OK with this as well.

To add to the mix, would anyone support a restriction of 1 goalie on the farm?

At this point only one team has 2 goalies on the farm, so we could easily give them an exemption until it sorts itself out.

I just think the goalie position is important and would hate to see the extra farm position chewed up by stock piling goalie prospects.

It may be a non-issue, but better to give it some thought now, before it becomes an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-30-2010, 12:00 PM
C.J's Avatar
C.J C.J is offline
New York Rangers
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 788
Send a message via MSN to C.J
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
why was there even free keepers to begin with? it never made sense...lol. 13 keepers should be 13 keepers period in my opinion so this is a great idea.

get er done!
We took the rules from some leagues that have used them before, but knew that we might need to tweek them a little over time like in cases like these.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
I'm OK with this as well.

To add to the mix, would anyone support a restriction of 1 goalie on the farm?

At this point only one team has 2 goalies on the farm, so we could easily give them an exemption until it sorts itself out.

I just think the goalie position is important and would hate to see the extra farm position chewed up by stock piling goalie prospects.

It may be a non-issue, but better to give it some thought now, before it becomes an issue.
Restricting goalies on the farm would not be something we could change simply because its kinda hard to tell a team who is about to pick in a darft that has a few good goalies available that he cant pick any of them because he already has one on his farm.

Like the NHL all teams have the ability to draft as they wish, that is the beauty of a fantasy league.

If one gm feels that goalies are a high priority then he can draft a few of them, while other gms might feel they are not as big of a deal and feel they can always grab a goalie at the waiver draft.

Dont forget theough, by eliminating free keepers, it will force guys to better plan how to use their 5 farm spots and you will see teams even out their farm more
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-30-2010, 12:10 PM
Martin's Avatar
Martin Martin is offline
Chicago Blackhawks
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 72
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C.J View Post
Why not kill 2 birds with one stone here......and we can do the following in both leagues:

- increase the farm to 5

- eliminate the free keepers

- keep all rosters open all year, including playoffs

I think this not only solves some of our current problems, but also puts more players back into the waiver draft for a better selection.

I agree with this ... but what you mean by "both leagues"?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-30-2010, 12:13 PM
C.J's Avatar
C.J C.J is offline
New York Rangers
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 788
Send a message via MSN to C.J
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin View Post
I agree with this ... but what you mean by "both leagues"?
Steve and I run 2 leagues and keeps the rules the same for both, that was a cut and paste from an email to him.

The other league has had the same issues brought up so that is what prompted us to resolve them asap.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-30-2010, 02:00 PM
C.J's Avatar
C.J C.J is offline
New York Rangers
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 788
Send a message via MSN to C.J
Default

These rules will take effect immediately... All teams will be unlocked and can do business as usual (add/drops etc).

- There will be no more "free keepers"

- increase the farm team to 5 immediately.

- Roster protection will now be a "firm" 13.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-30-2010, 10:47 PM
Scott's Avatar
Scott Scott is offline
Los Angeles Kings
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kelowna, B.C.
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C.J View Post
These rules will take effect immediately... All teams will be unlocked and can do business as usual (add/drops etc).

- There will be no more "free keepers"

- increase the farm team to 5 immediately.

- Roster protection will now be a "firm" 13.


Just to clarify...these "free keepers" you are talking about are the players that have played less than 100 games in the NHL and 50 games for goalies? So for example Jamie Benn would have to be included in my 13 players or put him back on the farm at the end of the season?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-31-2010, 12:31 AM
C.J's Avatar
C.J C.J is offline
New York Rangers
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 788
Send a message via MSN to C.J
Default

Yes either he goes to one of your 5 farm spots or you need to classify him as a keeper
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-31-2010, 12:09 PM
Steve W's Avatar
Steve W Steve W is offline
Montreal Canadiens
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 60
Default

I like the new rules as you have proposed them, even though it means I have to re-think my keepers big time as we no longer have the free keepers.

I must say I really like the way you run this league CJ (Steve too in HFHL!) as you are always open to suggestions, you do listen to our concerns and you always seem to come up with just the right answer.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-31-2010, 12:47 PM
John C's Avatar
John C John C is offline
Colorado Avalanche
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 129
Default

I’m in favour of the rule change in general. I believe that it addresses the issue of a GM potentially abusing the farm eligibility rule. Is the decision on the number of farm spots final or is it still up for discussion?

J
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-31-2010, 01:45 PM
C.J's Avatar
C.J C.J is offline
New York Rangers
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 788
Send a message via MSN to C.J
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John C View Post
I’m in favour of the rule change in general. I believe that it addresses the issue of a GM potentially abusing the farm eligibility rule. Is the decision on the number of farm spots final or is it still up for discussion?

J

The total farm spots is final, the rules are effective now....we had to get something done asap.

We had to add at least 1 farm spot if we were going to remove "free keepers" in order to be fair. Gms had planned their teams based on some free keepers and to remove al lfre keepers outright would not be fair.

Going any higher than 1 more farm spot (5 total) would just allow team to store more players and that keeps players from the draft.

I find that when topics like this are open for discussion they tend to get replies from each gm that is best for their team. We need to make the decision that is best for the league to ensure it is fair and keeps the league around for years.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.